Showing posts with label lunk cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lunk cancer. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Lawyers take millions while asbestos victims get $8.12. But don't rush to shoot all of them. Some are heroes

The late night comics roll their eyes talking about settlements of class action suits where the plaintiffs get pennies and the lawyers walk with millions. For many, this legal larceny engenders the use of horse whips or water boards on the distinguished members of the bar.

But up close, there is very little funny about this practice.

Nevertheless, it's happening again. This time, the subject of the litigation is invisible fibers of asbestos that contaminates hundreds of millions of tons of vermiculite insulation stuffed in the walls and ceilings and attics of homes throughout North America.

W.R.Grace, which mined and sold potentially lethal Zonolite insulation, has agreed to pay $6.5 million Canadian under a settlement proposed by lawyers named by the Canadian version of the U.S. bankruptcy court. Court documents show half of the money -- $3.25 million -- will be paid to the Canadian lawyers who put the deal together, including a lawyer in Delaware who gets $360,000 for filing the papers with the U.S. bankruptcy court.

What this means is that if 400,000 Canadian homeowners -- the would-be plaintiffs in this class action suit -- sign up for money to decontaminate their homes, they could each pocket $8.12. Typically, asbestos removals from a home can cost in the tens of thousands of dollars because many contractors view the removal of hazardous material as a pot of gold.

Picture
Tremolite asbestos fiber

Meanwhile, south of the border, our government estimates that 15 million to 35 million homes contain dangerous material from the now closed vermiculite mine in Libby, Mont.

The real tragedy is that very few homeowners on either side of the border have a clue that their homes may be contaminated. Even fewer know that a deadline of Oct. 31 has been set for homeowners to notify the bankruptcy court that their homes are contaminated.

EPA promised to get the warning out years ago.

In attempting to declare a "public health emergency" in Libby, the agency promised to "blanket" television shows and the nation's hardware and home improvement chains with warnings about Zonolite. When the White House blocked the emergency notification, our environmental protectors in EPA headquarters forgot about the warning.

So today, most homeowners have no clue of the risk they face when their kids play in the attic or mom hooks up an exhaust fan or the cable guy strings his wire.

In repeated tests, government scientists and Grace's own experts have shown that the slightest disruption of the fluffy, nickel-size pieces of black, tan and gold tinted Zonolite released millions of the asbestos fibers that have caused asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer.

Picture
Raven Thundersky

If you question the toxicity of the asbestos that has decimated Libby, just check the town's cemetery or talk to Raven Thundersky in Winnipeg. Her parents and three sisters died from cancer and asbestosis from exposure to Zonolite in the family's government-built home on a remote First Nation reservation at Poplar River, Man.

In Washington state in 2000, Spokane lawyer Darrell Scott filed the nation's first Zonolite insulation suit on behalf more than 100,000 homeowners. But his efforts -- to get Grace to publish warnings of the danger -- and those of scores of other lawyers suing on behalf of thousands of people across the country sickened or killed from exposure to the Grace product were derailed when the 150-year-old company filed bankruptcy in April 2001.

This is an appropriate point to urge you not to set up the "Kill the lawyer" billboards.

While there obviously are greedy ones out there that embarrass their own profession, we would be worse off without the efforts of many lawyers. It's painfully apparent that government will not or cannot protect its citizens from corporate shenanigans. Lawyers – private practitioners, those with advocacy groups and even a bunch carrying federal ID cards - make them pay attention.

Think about it. Flavor manufacturers knew that the diacetyl in their butter flavoring was sickening their own workers and those in microwave popcorn plants. Most did nothing until they were dragged into court.

The same can be said for slipshod pharmaceutical producers, makers and users of benzene and scores of other chemicals and, of course, our friends in Columbia, Md., W.R. Grace.

The tens of thousands of pages of Grace documents, on which the P-I based its investigation and which the Justice department used to support the nation's largest environmental crime indictments, showed that Grace knew their miners and their families in Libby and their workers at hundreds of vermiculite processing plants were at risk. And kept it secret.

Nothing happened until a small law firm in Montana began suing the worldwide company on behalf of people who died because of its actions.

A federal grand jury issued criminal indictments against Grace and seven of its top bosses. It is hoped that the trial will finally begin in late winter.

While some of these lawyers are actual heroes, so are many of EPA's frontline troops – the emergency responders, investigators, toxicologists, physicians and scientists. They have busted their tails since the Seattle P-I first reported on the tragedy in Libby in 1999. Many stood up not only to Grace and the politicians in their pockets, but also to the political appointees in their own agency and the White House itself.

Some EPA regions are more involved than others. The regional offices in Denver and Seattle led the way. Chicago was right in the midst of it with its investigation of Grace's large Zonolite expansion plants in Minneapolis.

Even today, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported that the EPA gang from Chicago is back in town testing for asbestos in the air and dust in 30 to 50 homes. Between 2000 and 2004 EPA had removed contaminated soil from the yards of 268 homes near the plant.

Terry Thiele, who lived around the corner from the plant during his childhood, told the paper that he and his siblings and mother all have asbestosis to some degree and that his father died from mesothelioma.

"My whole family has lung X-rays that look like patchwork quilts because of all the scarring" from the fibers, Thiele told Star reporter Tom Meersman.

In Spokane, Scott told me: "People still don't know. There are probably 120,00 to 140,000 homeowners in Washington alone with Zonolite in their homes and most don't know it."

He is concerned that the Oct, 31 deadline imposed by Grace will pass unknown to millions across the country. He has asked Grace bankruptcy Judge Judith Fitzgerald to consider his class action filed in 2000 and to allow him to file on behalf of tens of thousands of Washington homeowners who own or occupy property containing the Zonolite insulation.

Fitzgerald has yet to rule on his motion.

Here are some links with more information:

Here is the court's notice of the October deadline.

This is EPA's page on asbestos and here's more than anyone would want to know about vermiculite.

NEW For those of you who asked for a phone number of a human who might know something about the issue, for years, EPA's Public Information Center in Seattle at (206) 553-1200 has been fielding questions on Zonolite insulation and the same vermiculite in garden products and potting soil.

A New Hope; Thriving With Mesothelioma

The news of being diagnosed with mesothelioma can be devastating, especially given the insidious nature of the disease. On average, 70% to 80% of reported mesothelioma cases have been exposed to asbestos, whether at work or in their environment. Considering that many manufactures continued to use asbestos long after the known toxic effects, it is almost too surreal to consider that those struggling with this cancer are suffering because of someone else’s greed.

An Unsuspected Intruder

The mesothelium is the protective membrane that insulates the body’s delicate organs, providing lubrication so that the organs can move freely without friction। When a person is exposed to asbestos, they breathe in the fibers, which get lodged in the mesothelium. The most common sites of mesothelioma are the mesothelium surrounding the lungs (pleura) and abdominal cavity (peritoneum).

Mesothelioma is one of the many lung diseases caused by asbestos. When malignant cells develop in the mesothelium, the membrane abnormally divides and invades neighboring tissues and organs. These cancerous cells can also spread from the original site of origin to other parts of the body. The signs and symptoms that accompany mesothelioma may not appear for several decades after exposure.

Symptoms of pleural mesothelioma:

• shortness of breath

• cough

• chest pain

Symptoms of peritoneum mesothelioma:

• weight loss

• abdominal pain and swelling

• bowel obstruction

• anemia and fever

There is Hope

Treating mesothelioma is dependant upon the location of the cancer and the stage of the disease. Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are traditional options. However, new treatments are continually being studied.

The National Cancer Institute sponsors clinical trials on a regular basis. Your participation in clinical trials offers you advanced access to new and improved treatment options that give you hope for a more positive outcome.

In addition, the government recognizes the horrendous injustice caused by the manufactures that weighed your life against their profit. Many law suits have developed as a result of mesothelioma. According to the RAND Corporation report, as of 2002, over 8,400 defendants and 730,000 claimants have filed suit with at least one defendant’s costs in excess of $800,000.
Matt Keily has focused his law practice on specializing in mesothelioma cases. He seeks to hold the manufacturers, distributors, and installers of asbestos related products responsible for the debt they owe the thousands of families now suffering with this life-threatening disease.

If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and you live in the Baltimore or D.C. area, please contact the law office of Matt Kiely today.

T&N Rochdale, asbestos and cancer - There WAS a cover up

Following recent controversial claims by Cyril Smith about asbestos, health and Turner & Newall (T&N), Rochdale Online has been given first access to a series of documents that clearly suggests there WAS a cover up by the factory about the dangers of the mineral.

The damning documents form part of the vast archive of T&N company documents that many thought were long ago destroyed by the Rochdale asbestos factory. Some of the documents were rescued in the 1980s from waste skips by T&N managers disgusted at the thought of a corporate cover-up.

The past decade has seen a number of academic articles and publications about asbestos and T&N.

Local attention recently turned to a New Statesman investigation: Asbestos – The Lies that Killed.

The New Statesman publication has caused controversy because of claims and documents suggesting that former MP Cyril Smith played a role in promoting asbestos and T&N in Parliament.

Sir Cyril has strongly denied any corporate cover up. Speaking on BBC North West Tonight. Sir Cyril gave the following frank rebuke: “Absolute rubbish. How could I cover up the dangers of asbestos?”

It appears Sir Cyril remains confident about the safety of asbestos. With strong echoes of his reassurances made in the early 1980's, Sir Cyril remains adamant: “Well of course there is no danger of asbestos to the public at large. You were never in danger of it. I was never in danger of it."

At one point Sir Cyril interrupted the interviewer, Stuart Flinders, saying: “Well I'm not sure you are correct, actually I think you are over-stating the case. There were people that worked there but they knew the dangers with it. But nobody made them work there. They could have left."

Since the New Statesman article and subsequent broadcasts, Rochdale Online now has access to original T&N documents that demonstrate a knowledge of the health and cancer risks from asbestos and the corporate response to this deadly knowledge.

Rochdale Online has the opportunity for its readers to see the papers for themselves and make their own decisions in a series of reports on the Spodden Valley section of this website - the links to which are available below.

None of these documents suggest that Cyril Smith, as Rochdale's MP in the 1970s and 80s, knew of the cancer risk.

They do, however, give a damning insight into T&N's emerging knowledge, attitude and reaction to cancer and health throughout the 20th century.

This document list is in no way exhaustive, it is a merely a representative account of key asbestos issues that could still have profound relevance for Rochdale in 2008। As the SSV campaign and others state: "History should not repeat itself regarding asbestos and the Spodden Valley site."

Asbestos - Early knowledge of danger: 1898

The document that accompanies this article is an excerpt from the H.M. Factory Chief Inspector's 1898 report that makes specific mention of asbestos.

Concerns about asbestos and health had been well documented by the late 19th Century. However the 1898 report was significant as this is official, state, recognition of the health hazard.

Miss Dean H.M Factory Inspector reported: “...The evil effects of asbestos have also attracted my attention. A microscopic examination of the mineral dust which was made by H.M.Medical Inspector clearly revealed the sharp, glass-like jagged nature of the particles, and where they are allowed to rise and to remain suspended in the air of a room, in any quantity, the effects have been found to be injurious, as might have been expected...”

Readers should note the careful phrase “in any quantity” in the precautionary warning about asbestos dust from Queen Victoria's reign.

To view the other articles in this series and to download the documents, visit the links below:

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13956/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-2

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13955/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-3


http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13954/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-4

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13953/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-5

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13952/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-6

http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/21/spodden-valley/13951/tandn-rochdale-asbestos-and-cancer-there-was-a-cover-up-part-7